Email exchange · 7 October 2026 – 16 October 2026

Questions about consultation, noise and decommissioning

A resident asked Blackthorn about consultation, local assessments and funding to remove the plant. On 16 October, Blackthorn said it did not intend to answer his follow-up requests individually.

Names, contact details, the resident’s address and housing-estate names are removed. Identifying email headers, repeated quoted text and standard footers are omitted. Original wording and typos are preserved. This copy contains eight emails through 16 October 2026; attachments listed in the original export are not reproduced or assessed here.

What the resident asked

After Blackthorn’s first reply, the resident asked for specific answers and records:

  • What had residents’ feedback changed in the proposal, and what records showed this?
  • Had Lackagh National School, Lackagh parish and Claregalway GAA been contacted before the application was submitted?
  • What cover existed for the project inbox, and what written community-engagement policy applied?
  • Was a fund, bond or other financial security already in place to pay for removing the plant?

What Blackthorn answered

  • On 13 October, Blackthorn described its engagement and referred to application reports on noise, glare, decommissioning and stone walls. It also explained the relationship between Blackthorn and BayWa r.e.
  • On 16 October, it said it was not obliged to provide internal records, policies, correspondence or internal communication and email-monitoring details beyond the application documents. It said it did not intend to answer these requests individually.
  • It directed observations to Galway County Council. The resident replied that most of his questions were not about sensitive or private information and that he needed answers to prepare his submission.

What the reply does not answer

  • Changes made after residents’ feedback

    The replies do not identify specific changes, drawing revisions or dated records showing how feedback changed the proposal before submission.

  • Contact with local organisations

    The replies do not provide the requested dates, methods of contact or copies of messages for the school, parish and GAA.

  • Inbox cover and engagement policy

    The replies do not explain the inbox-cover arrangements or provide the requested policy. This does not establish that the inbox was unattended.

  • Funding to remove the plant

    The replies do not confirm whether financial security was already in place, its amount or its start date. The earlier reply refers to the decommissioning statement in the application.

The emails, from first to last

Email exchange: page images

Open an image to see it at full size. The same wording is available as readable text above.

Page 1 of 8 — open full-size image
Redacted email exchange with Blackthorn Solar Farm, page 1 of 8. Full text is above.
Page 2 of 8 — open full-size image
Redacted email exchange with Blackthorn Solar Farm, page 2 of 8. Full text is above.
Page 3 of 8 — open full-size image
Redacted email exchange with Blackthorn Solar Farm, page 3 of 8. Full text is above.
Page 4 of 8 — open full-size image
Redacted email exchange with Blackthorn Solar Farm, page 4 of 8. Full text is above.
Page 5 of 8 — open full-size image
Redacted email exchange with Blackthorn Solar Farm, page 5 of 8. Full text is above.
Page 6 of 8 — open full-size image
Redacted email exchange with Blackthorn Solar Farm, page 6 of 8. Full text is above.
Page 7 of 8 — open full-size image
Redacted email exchange with Blackthorn Solar Farm, page 7 of 8. Full text is above.
Page 8 of 8 — open full-size image
Redacted email exchange with Blackthorn Solar Farm, page 8 of 8. Full text is above.

← All correspondence